Wokeness/SJWism

I use the words wokeness and wokeism interchangeably throughout my blogs. Use the terms 'wokeness/wokeism' for lack of a better word . I do not have a fairly substantial vocabulary, so it is hard for me to find ways to describe the wokeness/wokeism phenomenon  (unlike rightoids, when I use said words, I am not appropriating that language from liberation movements and flipping it)

They radlib sh** Liberal 2.0ers ask the anti woke crowd and the woke critical crowd to define wokeness, but we should turn the tables around and ask those wokeies to define 'white supremacy' since they throw that word around so much nowadays , as much as the 'right wing' throw around the term wokeness.

'White Supremacy'—is all that the Liberal 2.0ers talk about. They believe being a border hawk is White Supremacy, they wrongly believe that celebrating the Fourth of July (Independence Day) is White Supremacy…

A poc person gets a major degree in white supremacy studies and then they are going to put that degree to use by going on TV and talking about white supremacy

On some subconscious level the radlib Liberal 2.0ers are pulling out all the stops to get anti diversity people (right wingers and borderhawks in particular) to find ways on how they can better accommodate foreigners, heretics, and multi ethnic enclaves amongst the greater backdrop of a multicultural US more than we already do 

For the anti diversity people (right wingers and borderhawks in particular) this from them is asking too much. So the radlibs should find new ways to win their support if they can't win their support through the whole white supremacy rhetoric, and defining it would be a good start.

Right wingers wrongly overall make things about identity/nationality instead of ideology/action. It's the same way with how the right wing defines antisemitism when it comes to criticism of Israel. Us leftists on the other hand cares about the nature of the ideology/actions with the identity merely being a descriptor. To the right wing, it is the identity that determines what is right. Liberal 2.0ers are right wingers

I hope more people like me reject the feel-good wokeness, and instead advocate more for a combination of social justice advancement and self reflection within certain communities. Label and biased towards certain “woke” narrative will never resolve any problems.

Right wingers aim their fire at wokeism because they want to attract people and they know workers are not down with that stuff (and for good reason). 

Cries against “wokism”  may be banal but I also think there is sometimes an emperors new clothes situation where people don’t actually want to talk about it (so I will)

Criticism against wokeism and idpol, and especially putting it forward as some great 'threat' of the current age, beyond its political ramifications (I mean, who does the discourse serve, at the end of the day?) has to be the lowest hanging fruit imaginable...(but I like fruit i.e blueberries, kiwi, grapes , fruit stripe gum, Trix etc and former President George Washington did cut down his cherry tree making all low hanging fruit there for the taking and I like George Washington soooo..)

When people cry about "wokeness", what they're actually referring to is usually the white moderates MLK complained about and not actual leftists. "Progressives" and Republicans are both happy to pretend that liberal 2.0ers are the left. Any American too young to remember the antiglobalization movement and the Ralph Nader campaign has never actually witnessed a "left."

The black women who came up with "idpol" were ALREADY socialists, so criticism from class reductionists that assumes liberal 2.0ers made up idpol is usually redundant and cringey. "White moderates don't want to talk about class" is not profound or unexpected.

It's white liberal 2.0ers playing the game of "cancel culture" where you lose if you're a perceived by them to be racist and therefore a bad person. Actual leftists like me don't assume the liberal subject. We assume everyone has internalized b.s  to work on.

Exactly, rainbow capitalism is still capitalism. Appropriation of idpol without a proper understanding of the ties between race/gender and capitalism is superficial, weaponized to attempt a showing that a "good, friendly" capitalism can exist. 

I find Slavo Zizek is equivocating too much here -- is he criticizing socialists for understanding the intersections between race, gender, class, nation, etc. (showing his high standing and blind spots by ignoring the socialist thinkers that happened to be WOC that have already talked about these topics), or is he saying people who are advocating for rainbow capitalism are socialists (when they are explicitly not due to advocating for capitalism)?

And there's material reason why capitalists want to adopt socialist aesthetics without the socialism -- class consciousness is very absent in analyses under the liberal 2.0 individualism Zizek mentions here, and so it ignores the genealogy of how "idpol" even came to be -- "wokeism" scribed over the palimpsest left over from the erasure of actual idpol (which I support) -- and this works to convince people's support toward maintaining capitalism without class consciousness because it's appeasement by seemingly feeding "progress" while material conditions worsen.

While I don't fully agree with Slavo Zizek here, I do appreciate his criticisms of opportunism and wish he better pointed to antiopportunism during other successful socialist revolutions in the face of wars between capitalist and imperialist nations, instead of criticizing opportunism and then advocating for opportunism. Pulling from Lenin would be particularly relevant here in the face of Putin: (1) because it shows how Vladimir Lenin and Putin are no where near ideologically similar, and (2) it shows why Putin has had a few moments of trying to drag Lenin through the mud, re:Ukraine -- he's scared of Russia's proletariat.

So I understand his criticisms of "wokeism" as opportunism maintaining the status quo, but I think his premise that "wokeism" -- in it's White Moderate form a la MLK -- is leftist fails to hold any water if you look at the details without entertaining alt-right rhetoric. See here for more

I don't think that Slavo Zizek is saying that wokeism is leftist. He is arguing that a true socialist left practically does not exist because we are caught up in a nominally "left" versus "right" culture war. 

He says explicitly that his position is not "beyond left and right" because these are not outmoded notions, but rather to (in a sense) reconstitute leftism to its traditional class struggle heritage (this might be one reason why he calls himself a "moderately conservative communist"). 

He is not saying we should not be intersectional, but that we should understand class struggle to be a fundamentally different sort of thing that identity-based struggle (the former seeks to abolish the antagonism, whereas the point of the latter is reconciliation). Also, he has argued in a previous article that Vladimir Putin fails to live up to the anti-imperialist legacy of Lenin.

Slavo Zizek is saying that left-right antagonisms are pretty much entirely cultural in this moment and not material.

“Wokeism” -for lack of a better word- as a phenomenon and political movement, was always going to happen eventually; it’s the natural conclusion of the very composition of the transformative movements that American social order have undergone. 

This being a combination of multiple factors (adoption of postmateralistic attitudes of the petite bourgeoisie, the American virtue of the exceptionality of the individual, the latent racial problems that merely transform but never dissipate that are too much to even truly detail in one comment, the capitalistic tenacity of constant reproduction, and even the pluralist organization theory- even while being truly erroneous and nebulous in its application- prescribes this very outcome given the specific proclivities outlined before).

With all this, though, is a much simpler realization that explains a often neglected factor in which right media not only exists as a vector of constant reaction, but as a body that must repose itself in this very way to disseminate this information. 

I figure we all know what right media is doing and why is it doing it, but we rarely ever look at the composition of media forms and mostly important how they differ. 

The “indoctrination” of the left is a byproduct of the conservatives in itself, not true actual indoctrination, but the abstraction essence of the right- hampered by its own theoretical limitations, especially Christian fundamentalist thought- with the combination of market shift towards capitalist ventures, therefore a reunification of different forms of knowledge. This being aided by the Protestant ideal of “idleness is wrong in all contexts”, thinking therefore must be to actualize something and thinking must never take place in the private sphere. Calling movies woke, yet being theoretically opposed to the study of films or the arts itself is why the left will always dominate certain areas.

Thus, rightism is against the idea of media in itself, but in order to sustain their political validity in the ever changing transformative society, they must socialize new generations of conservatives by creating multilevel structures of conservative thought: commonplace right media for the older generation, the pop commentary section-composed of people like Peterson, Shapiro, and turning point-and the Thiel bank-roll- the alt-right theorists such as Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin who are supported by the troll section (Sam Hyde and other podcasters who merely react, think Rush Limbaugh).

It’s not simply calling things woke, it’s much deeper. What this implies is something either profound or already realized by someone else: the only “art” that a right-wing person must be grounded in the only right-oriented process that is transformative in itself: fascism. Otherwise it’s only a reaction or a return to foundation, hence complaining about leftist views in media is moot but essential to their worldview. This isn’t to say right wingers can’t compose a unique or novel viewpoint, it’s that by analyzing the historical dialectics of rightism, it’s stands in opposition to contemporary media and film.

But we can't just 100 percent blame conservatives either, even if they do play into it as much as they can. 

The lib left has been successful at radically changing the culutre while nothing materially is changing for anyone. You can see it in the Democrat media, CNN, MSNBC, and especially NPR and public/community radio. Schools in Democrat voter areas are much more woke than they were just a few years ago. 

And then there are all the corporations who act woke to imrove their ESG rating. If you compare the culture to what it was 10 years ago things have changed drastically. 

This isn't all for the worse necessarily but it has created a chasm between left libs and conservatives to the point where there is no room to talk about actual working class issues.

The world is full of woke, SJW nonsense, idealist arguments, elitist counterculture, postmodern social constructionism, an obsession with creating problems where there were none (like "manspreading", "cultural appropriation"), superiority, looking for excuses to call people homophobic or whatever, etc. I am talking about libs. 

If you look at right wing pundits and "intellectuals," they have made the decision to aim their fire at what they call "wokeness/wokeism," which is their word for any effort to tear down the anti blackness and or white ethnocentrism of our society to allow a more honest and inclusive teaching of history or at describing systems of oppression--including class. 

Demonstrating eitzhaimHi's point, Republicans have started decrying "essentialism" (I am generally anti essentialist so that sucks) like they're Judith Butler from the 1990s (even worse), in order to fight against the CRT (which is, in reality, is anti-essentialist which is one good thing I can say about the CRT):

https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/who-killed-essentialism

At this point, articles explaining how Republicans took over the term "woke" have been commonplace for years and so I digress here

The terms woke left and alt right is a somewhat ill-defined bogeymen used in the way of a moral panic to monolithize disparate groups.

But what the 'woke left' and alt right share is a denial of hybridity, fluidity and diversity - they’re equally myopic and zero sum in that sense. But at least the “woke” camp pushes against oppressive forces of patriarchy, racism, bigotry etc, even if they do so from such blunt and absolute naivety.

The word inclusive (not the way I use it)  when used by Liberal 2.0era is a code word for toxic wokeness or pushing extremist idpol nonsense

I am not a supporter of wokeness, but generally in a agree to disagree sort of way. 

I agree with this video by Ana Kasperian titled "Wokeness Is Hurting Democrats"

I love that Brianna Joy Gray made Bethany Mandel look weak and foolish when she rightfully asked Bethany to describe wokeness (as mentioned here).  While I am no fan of wokeness and I critique it, I feel that Bethany Mandel's crusade against what she sees as wokeness was in bad faith so to see BJG own Bethany in the debate on wokeness was awesome and good to see.   

Of course asking Liberal 2.0ers to define what is a woman and what does far right mean (along with describing what charges Donald Trump is being charged with by DA Alvin Bagg in NY) would have a seemingly similar effect on some people with my type of mindset

Wokeness is a said to be needed due to our country becoming more diverse so there’s that

I am against Wikipedia type of wokeness which I call toxic wokeness

Wokeness and idpol are still a lot better than right wing ‘wokeness and idpol’ (racism). 

The overtly woke left who criticize Breadtubers are inhumane for doing so

“Wokeness is a bourgeoisie moral revolution” - Wesley Yang

Here is a good analysis of wokeness and just how evil and repugnant of an ideology wokeness is

You cannot be woke and anti imperialist. You can be anti racist , an advocate of social justice and equality but you can’t join the mobs like ones CNN is fermenting around liberal causes if you oppose their wars. Wokeism is pro Imperialist    

Wokeness is not about whites hating themselves. If that were true there wouldn’t be hundreds of white Breadtubers who not only are NON self loathing but who are in fact arrogant. This study though provides balance to this viewpoint

Wokeness does not mean African Americans are always victims no matter what. If that were true, then Liberal 2.0 SJWs wouldn’t be getting away with harassing Dr Ben Carson, Candace Owens and Kanye West like they often do. However a good possible counterpoint to this is the fact that some engage in heretical behavior that draws condemnation, does not negate the former since they are separate things

Wokeness is not about causing endless strife. Republicans generally make no solid effort to build bridges and instead just outrage monger over our first world exaggerated issues (though most of GOP cultural complaints come down to them resisting changes imposed by Democrats especially by Liberal 2.0ers and non Liberal 2.0 progressives)

But to play devil’s advocate, on wokeness causing strife and not building bridges, in 2009 some well meaning liberal Feminists did want no part of building bridges (literally) as they siphoned billions of dollars aimed at construction in former President Barack Obama’s stimulus plan

In 2009, women’s groups were appalled at the former President Barack Obama’s stimulus plan for being not being liberal feminist enough for them. To them, grids and dams stimulus funding were non feminist.  

Woke op eds immediately appeared in major newspapers with woke titles like “Where are the New Jobs for Women?” and “The Macho Stimulus Plan.” 

A group of notable feminist economists created a petition which quickly ballooned to more than 600 signatures, and that petition called on then president elect Barack Obama to add projects within the health, child care, education, and social services fields to “institute apprenticeships” to train women for “at least a third” of the infrastructure jobs 

At the same time, more than 1,000 feminist historians signed an open letter urging then President Obama not to favor a “heavily male-dominated field” like construction: “We need to rebuild not only concrete and steel bridges but also human bridges.” The moment these groups became aware of each other, they formed an anti-stimulus plan action group known as WEAVE–Women’s Equality Adds Value to the Economy.

A team of six AP reporters who have been tracking the funds find that the $300 billion sent to the states is being used mainly for health care, education, unemployment benefits, food stamps, and other social services. According to Chris Whately, director of the Council of State Governments, “We all talked about ‘shovel-ready’ since September and assumed it was a whole lot of paving and building when, in fact, that’s not the case.”  Read more here 

Wokeness is a strong commitment to identity politics, which uses its own distinct jargon, and which downplays economic analysis. This includes engaging in performative in-group rituals that uses its own distinct jargon.

Though wokeness can also be seen as a aesthetically progressive (or actually Liberal 2.0) tendency among professionals of the Neoliberal era, that combines elements of Liberal and radical feminism with subaltern racialism. Though.originally wokeness was a collective black thought which literally meant not being a zombie, or asleep to the struggle. White Liberal 2.0ers, gen z and politicians have again changed the term for there own benefit.

Wokeness is largely equivalent with Liberalism 2.0. The particular boundaries of wokeness vary for individuals and groups.

Wokeness is supposed to be ambiguous and fluid, just like gender, since we are talking about social and cultural warfare, and so there are sides wokeness wants people to take and tribes to become part of.

To be honest, I do not like the term wokeness due to it being an euphemism for SJW, and using euphemisms is equivalent to cowardice, so I don't like using the term except as noted in this blog

I usually instead try to use more specific terms for what others call wokeness.

The obsession with compartmentalization is contrary to the Marxist concepts of dialectal materialism. People should stop labelling everything and instead start considering that these conflicting "woke" opinions are coming from a fellow person, with similar mental compositions.

It is amazing how few enemies people will* make when they presume them to be similar to themselves and not obfuscated by twenty layers of political and/or social presupposition

Woke opinions are born of a desire for a person to remove himself/herself  of the inherently human, but uncomfortable fact that our self identity of a race-ethnicity, gender or sexuality births this idea of an anti-identity , not through intentional segregation but instead through creating a personal spectrum relating these antithetical concepts of identity.

Some people say that ignorance to a person’s own personal biases are just as bad as a person 'openly' embracing their personal biases

 Because "liberalism", "conservatism", "capitalism", "socialism", "communism", "anarchism", "fascism" and "feminism" have also been used with exaggerated definitions to browbeat people, they too, of course, are meaningless nonsense words.

Woke people correctly identify that badness of racism, sexism, etc, but they actually do not understand what essentialism is. As a result of this ignorance, they begin to see essentialism itself as an essential quality of certain kinds of people... and the rest is history.

Like they despise essentialism so much (while understanding its universal nature so little) that they have become rabid essentialists themselves.

Beginning in the 2010s, wokeness came to encompass a broader awareness of social inequalities such as sexism, and has also been used as shorthand for American Left ideas involving identity politics and social justice, such as the notion of anti blackness (Afro Pessimism) and reparations for African Americans.

Following the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri in 2014, the phrase was popularised by BLM 'activists' seeking to raise awareness about police shootings with more focus on police shootings on African Americans. 

After seeing use on Black Twitter (which was a great place to start it), the term woke became an Internet meme and was increasingly used by whites, often to signal their support for BLM, which some commentators have criticised as cultural appropriation (how shocking!!! /s). Mainly associated with the millennial generation, the term spread internationally and was added to the Oxford English Dictionary in 2017.  I was one of those whites who used the word woke back then throughout the 2010s in such a positive manner.

So I guess that conservative media has picked up on this word woke in recent years and uses it as a catchphrase to immediately dismiss liberal 2.0 (and some left) ideas - much like leftists and especially Liberal 2.0ers use conservative/alt right/nazi labels to immediately dismiss anyone disagreeing with them. But it does not really change that there is a contemporary set of ideas that originated, or became mainstream, only in about the last decade or less. And that is what I am talking about.

If it makes people who are offended by me using woke in a negative manner happier, When I write or say 'woke' in a negative manner, in your head just replace the word 'woke' with post Liberal progressivism .To me the meaning is the same, but maybe to you reading this it would be more understandable. Or I could list out specific issues as I mention similarly elsewhere in this post etc. It is just much faster to use a catchword.

Wokeness can be seen as some kind of Rorschach test in a verbal form

A very few mainstream liberal 2.0ers and leftists used the term "woke". It went from being mostly used in regards to black politics, to being a construction of classic liberal, right libertarian and to a larger extent conservative politics.

Woke is a demonization erasing the nuances and complexities of Liberal 2.0 brand of progressivism. It's a shorthand term designed to characterize a feeling instead of engaging in thought ("ah ha! Yes wokeness I know that one"). As if it's the smart way to respond to "the woke left". (the left is not woke, what the US calls left is really Liberal 2.0, leftists are nowhere as near woke as Liberal 2.0ers are)

But most Liberal 2.0ers including post liberal progressives can describe their positions, what they believe and why, in great detail. Very few of whom were thankfully ever  in the "all whites are racist" - "all heterosexuality is rape" libtard camp.

Conservative media focused there (like Libs of Tik Tok, Fox News, Dailywire-caller etc) and reconstructed radicalism as the term "woke" because it helped energize the most people to their position at the time.

But in Truth, the majority of leftists and progressives (but not the majority of Liberal 2.0ers) like me are rightfully FAR more concerned with workers rights, poverty wages, corporate domination and housing affordability than we are with idpol.

"Woke" is a joke, and can only be reaffirmed as a concept by the most extreme examples. My favorite was that big fake-titty teacher. I love that there was a story about that teacher sky diving and that the teacher became a minor celebrity among conservative media for a bit. Conservativism needs those strange stories of "wokeness" so bad, that it risks creating Instagram level celebrities.

Anyways, laughing at those people is sort of fun. But can't be maintained. Substance like materialism, values (like expressed here) that will actually improve people's lives will eventually be needed. But conservatives fail to produce time and time again. They're happy with their defensive position, and fail to create a better future.

Substance is ultimately lacking when you're just waiting around for the next big tittied teacher or leftwing pedophile to come along. It gets sad and disappointing.

To some "woke" is all that is bad, to others ”woke” is everything that is good

Or maybe “wokeism” is merely a tool used by right wing reactionaries to keep the culture war alive. To act as if there is a significant “woke” culture being propagated by the liberal 2.0ers and the college students that is significant outside of the internet requires some evidence in my opinion. And for traditional media it’s mostly right wing news outlets calling things “woke” in a mad attempt to discredit any change ever.

I like that wokeness alerts attention to injustices in society. But that is balanced out a bit by this article (which I agree with btw), “Defining my Oppression, the Neoliberalism of defining my oppression” by Chi Chi Shi

There are a lot of things that people refer to as "woke" that i disagree with. Overkill idpol or even many aspects of non overkill idpol as a whole for instance are risky or even dangerous as idpol divides us further in an already divisive country and world

But there are a lot of things about human rights, like rights for marginalized people, that some people who often disagree with would call "woke" that I however agree with. So wokeness is in the eye of the beholder

The wokeness I am particularly against is woke things like postmodern intellectuals and overly-sensitive student activists. I am not against gender equality, LGBTQ acceptance, and civil rights 

When I critique wokeness, I am not using my critique of wokeness as an anti black dogwhistle since I am pro black. I do however want us to defeat dogwhistle politics, see here for how and why.

I never said that leftists like me being oppositional to racism and sexism amounts to ignoring the class struggle. In fact, us Marxists have very specific analyses of racism and sexism, and we are generally involved in opposing them. That is something very different from what is called woke politics.

Wokeness also can be seen by many to be virtue signaling that is done by the Liberal 2.0 ,and Liberal Left in general

Wokeness isn’t some powerful force ,the entities that promote wokeness are the powerful ones. Wokeism "by chance" coincides with a material ideology for people who are in power. For the rest of us not in power,  wokeness is just some illusory rhetoric. I expand on thie connection in this section of my blog

This makes it sort of like a religion, of course verything is a religion in that sense

There is however, such a thing as ‘Woke food’ . Food delivery app Postmates celebrated Pride month in 2022 with a new menu category to help users avoid unwelcome poop during backdoor fun

The video promotion by Postmates features a BDSM-clad eggplant representing the "top", and a little peach representing the "bottom" navigating through dietary choices. 

The video is a colorful and over the top presentation of how the food categories curated by the food delivery app will help the "bottom" avoid poop making an unwelcome appearance during intimate relations.

Half of the LGBTQ identifying users in the replies on the Twitter post of the video are not thrilled to say the very least about Pride month being reduced to (and represented by) intercourse and poop. However, others seem very supportive.

Also, Postmates made a follow up post here: https://twitter.com/Postmates/status/1534971339953491968 and the comments are very negative. I guess they flew too close to the sun

I feel that Postmates is cool and base for doing an unpc thing like they did with their Eat with pride bottom poop campaign but I am not a fan or even a supporter really of that campaign since they still used a very woke (yes you can be unpc and woke at the same time) type of Pride campaign and thus are a perfect example of the Liberal 2.0 threat we are facing in our society by that type of Pride campaign 

This article .and this article expand on this in both ways. My views on this are much much closer to the former article than the latter article.  

This type of Pride campaign was meant to show Postmates love for the LGBTQ community in a passionate and warm way and I commend Postmates for that attempt (though it could also be Postmates like all companies [i.e Amazon] pretending to be woke in order to hide their greedy capitalistic, monopolistic [if they want to be monopolistic they should use a Guild Socialism model to do so] and by extension inhumane treatment of their workers). 

But Postmates used a Liberal 2.0 type of Pride campaign that ended up being extremely unintentionally homophobic so that is a terrible result and does more harm than good for the LGBTQ community . Tech companies should not be stereotyping the LGBTQ community even if they are doing so in a ‘pro’ LGBTQ sort of way

Postmates should have used Left wing (non woke) types of methods for that Pride campaign instead of Liberal 2.0 methods. If they did it like that I would have been fine with that pride campaign 

Oh to show Postmates checked all of their Intersectionality boxes, they made a donation to a charity that was founded by an African American women to support Trans people who are food insecure or mentally handicapped.

However I indiscriminately don’t care for companies promoting any holidays or special occasions at all because doing so alienates people in one way or another who don’t celebrate or partake in them . See this section of my blog for more

Even though I am against public kink by straights and LGBTQ people (like at Pride events), if kink at Pride being overly sexual means that LGBTQ can't be commercialized like with the Postmates campaign (which are counterproductive or backfire) then maybe there is a silver lining with kink at Pride events but only for LGBTQ people only.

A more simple example of woke food would be avocado toast

There is also woke medicine. This type of wokeness is wrong since it falsely states that what they see as ‘pervasive racism’ is some health crises which directly linked it with the pandemic and that just enflamed both the racial unrest and pandemic issues at the same time in a clusterf*ck sort of way by creating this false equivalency (which I touch on in this section of my blog a bit)

The fact that 1,000 epidemiologists, doctors, social workers, medical students, and other health experts had signed the letter shows that in some ways even our medical field is woke. 

Though at least that woke medicine tactic of tying in the pandemic to the racial unrest protests and riots as mentioned above, helped shift the attention (in an organic way) away from the pandemic for awhile to other things (like the racial unrest protests and riots) which helped people who normally wouldn’t make that attention shift make that attention shift and thus preventing them from worrying about the pandemic like they were before , so maybe that brand of woke medicine has some positive ‘off label’ effects if you view it through that lens

Woke medicine also involves woke medical people like that infectious-disease epidemiologist at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, being classist and cruel by wrongly stating that teachers should not be included as essential workers to reduce health inequities because in his twisted mind , teachers have college degrees, are often white and are middle class. 

I fully support including teachers as ‘essential’ workers since education and educating students is one of the most essential jobs a person can have. I support Autonomy (Marxism) and Anarcho Syndicalism so I also feel that woke Harvard professor is a counter revolutionary due to him being Anti worker as mentioned above . 

Autonomy (Marxism) includes a wider definition of working class (i.e by including non wage earners) than other pro worker ideologies so I am naturally against not listing teachers as essential workers 

Penalizing a whole employment field because most of then have a college degree (when college degrees are shoved down our throats by Liberal 2.0ers) is mind bogglingly stupid, evil, irrational and counterproductive to the max

Other woke medicine exists like the woke so called ‘expert’ in ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, who wrongly said that he thinks that in his mind it is reasonable to put essential workers ahead of older people in part due to essential workers being disproportionately minorities and that older populations tend to be whiter. 

He believes old peoples’ lives don’t matter as much as the lives of essential workers and that is not only woke but also ageist and Scrooge type of cruel. 

A more concrete example of woke medicine would be elderberry tincture and testosterone

Gas prices are not woke, they are high due to corporate price gouging more than anything else.

Though sanctions against Russia, souring relations with some countries in the Middle East, along with some domestic certainly can lead to some people believing that gas is woke. Gas prices likely would have grown (though not as much) under Republicans, seeing how they'd have probably enacted many of the same policies as Democrats (especially corporate and neocon)

There is a clear antagonism between the woke SJW politics of college students and the middle class, and the very defiant working class.

Here are some more woke takes by me here (so this page doesn’t become a big old word salad)

My take on Disney’s recent woke push can be found here

I agree with this New Republic article on Rand Paul and John Stossel (viewing said article through the lens of CRT would create some interesting hot takes)

Liberal 2.0ers in their own words betraying their wokeness

“A leftist government doesn't exist because being on the left has nothing to do with governments.” Gilles Deleuze

This might be a good strategy in our struggle against wokeness:

"A antidote to wokeness isn’t to fight wokeness directly. It can’t be done, that’s a losing battle. The true solution is to gradually rebuild a vision for a shared American identity that is so deep and so powerful that it dilutes wokeism to irrelevance, one that no longer leaves us susceptible to being divided by corporate elites for their own gain".from here https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/woke-inc-corporate-america-society-vivek-ramaswamy (click that link to read more)

Being against CRT and wokeness does not make someone a white supremacist, I am against the CRT and wokeness as are the VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS AND EUROPEANS

I am thinking what Tulsi Gabbard said here is base?  “I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue & stoke anti-white racism actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms," At worst what she said wasn’t wrong or offensive. See more of my thoughts on this quote by her here

SJW 

I echo everything in this article on totalitarian SJW ‘fine upstanding individuals’, here is a snip : 

“Unfortunately, Mr. Rosa’s other examples of “social justice” in action—the feminist revival, the new visibility of transgender issues and opposition to “Islamophobia”—are squarely in train-wreck territory. Not that there’s anything wrong with the principles: Most Americans support gender equality, believe transgender people should be able to live as they wish and reject anti-Muslim hate. But social justice warriors have turned these causes into malignant self-parody. Their feminism frets over men sitting with their legs apart on public transit, seeks dissent-free “safe spaces” and cries oppression at concern about obesity’s health risks. Their transgender advocacy demands respect for customized gender identities with personal pronouns that may change on a whim and crucifies a devoutly progressive filmmaker for a “transphobic” joke that presumes that female characters are anatomically female. Their anti-Islamophobia trashes feminist critics of conservative Islamism and victim-blames journalists murdered for publishing Mohammed cartoons.”  These SJWs fools waste their pathetic energy on things like above that don’t matter and that over 90 percent of the Western world disagrees with them on

btw I support the Kimono Wednesday event at that museum and I hope they bring it back. This is a good piece on that

But here is a more generous post on SJWism I made which shows to SJWs “I come in peace”

It’s not that I am against SJWs or their causes per say, it’s just that I am against the authoritarianism that the SJWs are willing to wield to impose their rules onto others

I do support some social justice champions and their SJWs causes: like MLK Jr and Rosa Parks and their SJW cause and suffragettes of the early 20th century and their SJW cause. That is good SJWism

As much as I tend to critique SJWs , I will never go further and whine about SJWs either. This is because I know that most people who whine about SJWs pretty much just delve into racism, sexism, and homophobia under the guise of "free speech."

When I say 'SJW in these blogs,' I do not mean feminists (since I am a feminist) or racial justice activists and I do not mean real anti fascists 

SJWs and PC police take away our childhood and all that we loved growing up (ymmv). We need to counter against them because they are part of the problem and we need a solution

The best way for SJW to counter ‘hate’ is to follow Fred Hampton’s lead

“We don’t think you fight fire with fire best; we think you fight fire with water best. We’re going to fight racism not with racism, but we’re going to fight with solidarity. We say we’re not going to fight capitalism with black capitalism, but we’re going to fight it with socialism […] We’re going to fight […] with all of us people getting together and having an international proletarian revolution”

Good quote "While I’m in full belief that even SJWs have the capacity for rational and critical thought, the fact that they choose not to employ it, even in the face of brutal facts, earns them the label of NPC? If your entire identity revolves around the superficial, and your entire belief system revolves around instructions from someone else, then you’re about as good as a computer program. If you won’t engage in civil debate, and instead  scream tired phrases at people when you run out of things to say, then there’s no person there, just a shell that somebody else is speaking through"

If you debate SJWs you will get shut down so fast it's not worth the bother. Like Trump supporters, these people don’t care what anyone else thinks and they literally can't conceive of the possibility that they aren't 100 percent correct and perfect unless they are failing their own purity tests in order to be performatively getting ever more woke. So they have no time for critical reflection of their hipocracy.

If you’re solving problems, you’re focused on solutions. If you’re fighting a war, you’re focused on an enemy.

I am against the SJW to an extent but unlike IDW members, I prefer to use PC methods to combat them since I sensitively pity SJWs(but if SJWs explain their actions like snopes does I can be less hostile to even alright with SJWism) also agree that some SJW complaints are correct. 

Dredging up things to complain about like these woke SJW trolls do instead of trying to do things to truly help poor, mentally disabled, struggling Americans of all race-ethnicities makes me sad and those people they truly could have helped if not for their SJWism worse off

If SJW and pc police want to force us to accept their extreme ideologies they should literally use Totalitarianism methods to do so. 

That way I can respect them for being bada** while also embracing new ideologies (their warped ideologies and against my will)

We need to use digital activism like trolling and democratic guilt methods that I would approve of to get people into dismantling the racist (by MLK Jr’s definition), social fascist-capitalist, liberal 2.0 homophobic-transphobic patriarchies etc

I believe in using those methods (including edgy, inquisitive, with us or against us ways thrown into the mix) to also prevent anti police abuse and disrespect and to build on our values and consciousness (in a syncretic way where we appreciate local and particular, tried and tested, family and community while seeking to to aid the most vulnerable in society while moving beyond the market) to usher in a the types of societies I write about in other parts of this blog while pretending to be nice about the methods we use to achieve this

I advocate via old school SJW methods, dismantling the racist white cis heteronormative male patriarchy to lead to my idea of a diverse world that I mention throughout this blog (including using Xenofeminism)

I am a SJW for gun rights and to rail against some aspects of anti americanism and economic views that are anametheic to my economic views. 

I am a Right (right as in correct right, not right wing right) SJW on combating rock music that has rap or lyrics I don’t like (I hated in the 1990s due to Alt Rock), certain aspects of video games (mainstreaming of video games, non family friendly, easy or woke video games, video games causing degeneracy like Haz says etc), ISIS and Al Qaeda not being treated as terrorists, the paganism of China, the troublesome aspects of Pokemon and similar things as can be seen throughout this blog

I think its cute that Kane & Lynch 2 the Dog Days of Summer tweeted this screenshot tweet. This shows maybe he is hopefully willing to reprogram ignorant anti diversity people (maybe like movie goers who fit that bill) to be pro diversity and enlightened on inclusion and equality like him.  We need more lifting each other up and less tearing each other down 

Though the movie reviewer in the video he was dissing in said tweet was not complaining about diversity in movies but instead was rightfully complaining about consumerism like in the movie industry which is true.

My thoughts on college SJWism can be found here  

etc

I am Anti Revisionist

"Democratic partisans in media are really the stupidest people ever to live. Lee and Ken broke an indisputably huge story with original documents showing the US Security State's role in censoring the internet, and DNC boys like@ryanlcooper can only think to complain he's on Fox. Because he broke a major story revealing it is the Biden Admin -- specifically the US Security State -- which directs Big Tech's censorship program to serve its own interests. Obviously, CNN or MSNBC wouldn't touch this story while people like Aaron are too dumb to understand it." Glenn Greenwald

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped.” George Orwell

I agree with a lot of the IDW’s views on SJW, PC and cancel culture (but in a way that Anthony Scaramuchi would tell them to convey their thoughts toward those things). Like on cancel culture, I tend to agree with these type of takes in this Tweet's replies

The IDW is NOT 'far right'. It oscillates between Right Center (between center right and right wing without adjectives) and Alt lite . Media Matters is wrong for smearing it as 'far right'.  Media Matters knows damn well that the IDW is not anywhere close to 'far right'. IDW may create an alt right pipeline but that does not make it 'far right'.  Media Matters is a Liberal 2.0 company so anything to the right of Krysten Sinema is 'far right' to those KNUCKLEHEADS

Hey Media Matters bojos (I mean that in the nicest possible way), Adolph Hitler was far right as was Atilia the Hun, Benny Mussolini , etc. So IDW can't be 'far right'  Criticizing wokeness is NOT far right, it is not even right wing. Wokeness is having negative effects on our society and it has to be critiqued and called out. Nothing is above criticism

This article tries to play devil’s advocate to safe spaces while agreeing with some anti safe space points. I am myself an anti safe spacer

I am fine with Right Wingers and Liberal 2.0ers having safe spaces to admit their right wing and Liberal 2.0 views without judgement since it is therapeutic. I am also fine with safe spaces for anti safe space people to use. I am anti safe space myself