apreoerpPaoieroitr

Party 1) I truly believe there’s a spot for Tulsi Gabbard’s brand of politics- similar to a moderate party but the opposite of the Forward party, conservative socially but populist/progressive economically

Party 2) At the same time, idpol is bad because it involves the ruling class conscripting minorities as a human shield. 

This is how you get 45: people gravitated toward him because he "owned the Liberal 2.0ers." And to own these Liberal 2.0ers you have get more unpc or even extreme, because the Liberal 2.0ers have made ostentatious anti-bigotry their number one plank.

This is also how you get Joe Biden, with voters religiously supporting trash Democrats to "own the racists." The ruling class is fine with both scenarios - they are victorious either way.

This is the political payload of idpol: to bait the working class into supporting the class enemy while also cementing an alliance between the ruling class, the Liberal 2.0 upper middle class, and members of "diverse communities."

This situation presents an easy opportunity for the Left to gain mainstream support by combining popular economic demands with a rejection of unpopular idpol. Picture this: in a climate where politics is dominated by crazy cultural stances, a Marxist party becomes politically "moderate" by rejecting woke nonsense. 

Obviously, there's no such party at this moment. The left hasn't been too keen to score this open goal. But perhaps before this window of opportunity shuts, someone could yet be able to rise up and say: "there is such a party!"

Party 3) So I am trying to nudge the Liberal 2.0ers away from all the truly insane positions in order to avoid a mass populist uprising against liberalism 2.0

Can you picture how popular a Left wing or Left leaning movement would be if it just ditched the child mutilation, open borders, and anti-White rhetoric things? A Left wing or left leaning movement that reflects the interests of working families instead of billionaire weirdo tech oligarchs and hedge fund managers?