SixthSenseofPolitshcs

I support political leaders who don't force their will upon people The views on our political system, political parties and ideologies ,bi/partisanship and similar polemic things are written in the book Mediations of a Militant Moderate https://books.google.com/books?id=VMZHuyK5NTsC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false   are an outline for at least some of my polemic views   We must make it easier for Congress to legislate. That means we must find  what to do   with the filibuster  (maybe like Jacobin said but maybe like  this , or  this  but I think we should at least try to find an  ad jac ent  or  just abolish the Senate as a whole ) to the filibuster to replace it and for the reason Krysten Sinema said she wanted to keep our filibuster or the pro filibuster reasons  here  and reform the Supreme Court. This article  provides a unique take on Progressivism vs Conservatism  Since the state is ...

Denying the legitimacy of trans people’s identities is a denial of phenomenological reality, including of the primacy of identity in self determining how people come to understand their own genders.  We are required to recognize how cis normativity operates in society to link gender to a rigid biological determinism that tells you that how you were born dictates what your gender is instead of recognizing the plasticity of human behavior to be liberated of these rigid rules of how we must identify depending on how we were born. To be truly critical of gender leads us to decouple gender from reductive physiological systems such as the question of whether or not people can get pregnant.  Patriarchal gender invokes rules and norms that in an authoritarian way tells you that the genitals one has at birth determine what gender a person can have and how they can express their gender. Any legit criticism of gender needs to recognize that this is a biological essentialism that has no r...

 

I use the words wokeness and wokeism interchangeably throughout my blogs. Use the terms 'wokeness/wokeism' for lack of a better word . I do not have a fairly substantial vocabulary, so it is hard for me to find ways to describe the wokeness/wokeism phenomenon  (unlike rightoids, when I use said words, I am not appropriating that language from liberation movements and flipping it) They radlib sh** Liberal 2.0ers ask the anti woke crowd and the woke critical crowd to define wokeness, but we should turn the tables around and ask those wokeies to define 'white supremacy' since they throw that word around so much nowadays , as much as the 'right wing' throw around the term wokeness. 'White Supremacy'—is all that the Liberal 2.0ers talk about. They believe being a border hawk is White Supremacy, they wrongly believe that celebrating the Fourth of July (Independence Day) is White Supremacy… A poc person gets a major degree in white supremacy studies and then th...

 I have major issues with modern Intersectionality, some of which is expressed  here A understated problem of Intersectionality is that Intersectionality causes people to focus less on their main identity (BIPOC, LGBTQ, woman) because they have to focus on multiple identifies along with it (like poc Transgender woman instead like poc woman , Transgender woman or poc)  . So Intersectionality waters down idpol  Intersectionality is contrary to Marxism, because Intersectionality is contrary to historical-dialectical materialism (historical-dialectical materialism is a core tenant of Marxism)  Intersectionality is a metaphor that is clumsily conceptualized in an attempt to describe how people can be discriminated against for various things at one time, in an attempt to argue that discrimination laws should account for this. It has zero to do with what should be our main concern as a Socialist, which is exploitation.  Our concern ideally should really be th...